[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200313122444.GH4885@vkoul-mobl>
Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2020 17:54:44 +0530
From: Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>
To: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: alsa-devel@...a-project.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
tiwai@...e.de, broonie@...nel.org, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
jank@...ence.com, srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org,
slawomir.blauciak@...el.com,
Bard liao <yung-chuan.liao@...ux.intel.com>,
Rander Wang <rander.wang@...ux.intel.com>,
Ranjani Sridharan <ranjani.sridharan@...ux.intel.com>,
Hui Wang <hui.wang@...onical.com>,
Sanyog Kale <sanyog.r.kale@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/16] soundwire: cadence: mask Slave interrupt before
stopping clock
On 11-03-20, 13:41, Pierre-Louis Bossart wrote:
> Intel QA reported a very rare case, possibly hardware-dependent, where
> a Slave can become UNATTACHED during a clock stop sequence, which
> leads to timeouts and failed suspend sequences.
>
> This patch suppresses the handling of all Slave events while this
> transition happens. The two cases that matter are:
>
> a) alerts: if the Slave wants to signal an alert condition, it can do
> so using the in-band wake, so there's almost no impact with this
> patch.
>
> b) sync loss or imp-def reset: in those cases, bringing back the Slave
> to functional state requires a complete re-enumeration. It's better to
> just ignore this case and restart cleanly, rather than attempt a
> 'clean' suspend.
>
> Validation results show the timeouts no longer visible with this patch.
>
> GitHub issue: https://github.com/thesofproject/linux/issues/1678
> Signed-off-by: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@...ux.intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/soundwire/cadence_master.c | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 28 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/soundwire/cadence_master.c b/drivers/soundwire/cadence_master.c
> index 02f18ce6b7e7..a4ba57f44c1f 100644
> --- a/drivers/soundwire/cadence_master.c
> +++ b/drivers/soundwire/cadence_master.c
> @@ -865,6 +865,24 @@ int sdw_cdns_exit_reset(struct sdw_cdns *cdns)
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(sdw_cdns_exit_reset);
>
> +/**
> + * sdw_cdns_enable_slave_interrupt() - Enable SDW slave interrupts
> + * @cdns: Cadence instance
> + * @state: boolean for true/false
> + */
> +static void cdns_enable_slave_interrupts(struct sdw_cdns *cdns, bool state)
Do you want to rename this as cdns_configure_slave_interrupts, with
argument as enable/disable... ?
--
~Vinod
Powered by blists - more mailing lists