[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200316075046.067984a1@coco.lan>
Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2020 07:50:46 +0100
From: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc: Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Marco Felsch <m.felsch@...gutronix.de>,
Hans Verkuil <hverkuil-cisco@...all.nl>,
Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the v4l-dvb tree
Em Fri, 13 Mar 2020 08:07:35 +0100
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org> escreveu:
> Em Fri, 13 Mar 2020 13:19:03 +1100
> Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> escreveu:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > After merging the v4l-dvb tree, today's linux-next build (arm
> > multi_v7_defconfig) failed like this:
> >
> > ERROR: modpost: "fwnode_get_name" [drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-fwnode.ko] undefined!
> >
> > Caused by commit
> >
> > dfc22c073b78 ("media: v4l2-fwnode: add initial connector parsing support")
> >
> > I have used the v4l-dvb tree from next-20200312 for today.
>
> Hmm... I double-checked at next-20200312. This function is defined
> at linux/property.h header:
>
> include/linux/property.h:const char *fwnode_get_name(const struct fwnode_handle *fwnode);
...
> So, at least up to next-20200312, everything looks fine on my eyes.
>
> The header is probably there, as the error happened at link stage.
>
> Maybe there is some merge conflict caused by merging a patch from
> some other tree that might have renamed or removed its implementation
> after next-20200312, or changed from obj-y target?
>
> Or maybe this changeset got reverted?
>
> a7914d1072fb ("device property: Export fwnode_get_name()")
I ended by cherry-picking this patch, applying it today on my tree.
Hopefully, this would avoid build problems and won't cause non-trivial
merge conflicts.
Thanks,
Mauro
Powered by blists - more mailing lists