[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200313212955.753f3cd2@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2020 21:29:55 +1100
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>
Cc: Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Marco Felsch <m.felsch@...gutronix.de>,
Hans Verkuil <hverkuil-cisco@...all.nl>,
Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com>,
Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the v4l-dvb tree
Hi Mauro,
On Fri, 13 Mar 2020 08:07:35 +0100 Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> Em Fri, 13 Mar 2020 13:19:03 +1100
> Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> escreveu:
>
> > After merging the v4l-dvb tree, today's linux-next build (arm
> > multi_v7_defconfig) failed like this:
> >
> > ERROR: modpost: "fwnode_get_name" [drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-fwnode.ko] undefined!
> >
> > Caused by commit
> >
> > dfc22c073b78 ("media: v4l2-fwnode: add initial connector parsing support")
> >
> > I have used the v4l-dvb tree from next-20200312 for today.
>
> Hmm... I double-checked at next-20200312. This function is defined
> at linux/property.h header:
>
> include/linux/property.h:const char *fwnode_get_name(const struct fwnode_handle *fwnode);
>
> Its implementation is at drivers/base/property.c, and this is always
> built, according with drivers/base/Makefile:
>
> obj-y := component.o core.o bus.o dd.o syscore.o \
> driver.o class.o platform.o \
> cpu.o firmware.o init.o map.o devres.o \
> attribute_container.o transport_class.o \
> topology.o container.o property.o cacheinfo.o \
> devcon.o swnode.o
>
> The v4l2-fwnode.c properly includes include/linux/property.h.
>
> So, at least up to next-20200312, everything looks fine on my eyes.
>
> The header is probably there, as the error happened at link stage.
>
> Maybe there is some merge conflict caused by merging a patch from
> some other tree that might have renamed or removed its implementation
> after next-20200312, or changed from obj-y target?
>
> Or maybe this changeset got reverted?
>
> a7914d1072fb ("device property: Export fwnode_get_name()")
Unfortunately, that commit is in the usb tree which I merge much later
than the v4l-dvb tree. You should not develop against linux-next, and
you should test your tree standalone as you do not know in which order
the trees will be merged by Linus (or me). The solutions here include
cherry-picking the commit into the v4l-dvb tree (since it is such a
simple commit and should not cause any complex conflicts) or merge part
of the usb tree into the v4l-dvb tree (which is possible since Greg
never rebases his tree).
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists