linux-kernel - Re: [GIT PULL] Floppy cleanups for next

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <6f4fd061-a47e-7de5-df6e-c3002beedee0@kernel.dk>
Date:   Mon, 16 Mar 2020 09:08:07 -0600
From:   Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
To:     efremov@...ux.com
Cc:     linux-block <linux-block@...r.kernel.org>,
        "Linux-Kernel@...r. Kernel. Org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] Floppy cleanups for next

On 3/16/20 4:47 AM, Denis Efremov wrote:
> Hi Jens,
> 
> The following changes since commit 5d50c8f405bf91d9d9a48628fde0f2f4ff069d7b:
> 
>   Merge branch 'for-5.7/io_uring' into for-next (2020-03-14 17:20:45 -0600)
> 
> are available in the Git repository at:
> 
>   https://github.com/evdenis/linux-floppy tags/floppy-for-5.7
> 
> Please pull
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> Floppy patches for 5.7
> 
> Cleanups from Willy Tarreau:
>   - expansion of macros referencing global or local variables with
>     equivalent code
>   - removal of incomplete support for second FDC from ARM code
>   - renaming the "fdc" global variable to "current_fdc" to differ
>     between global and local context
> 
> Changes were compile tested on arm, x86 arches. Changes introduce
> no binary difference on x86 arch (before and after the patches).
> On arm, incomplete support for second FDC removed. This set of
> patches with commit 2e90ca68 ("floppy: check FDC index for errors
> before assigning it") was tested with syzkaller and simple
> write/read/format tests for no new issues.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Denis Efremov <efremov@...ux.com>

Thanks - I hand applied the series, my for-next branch isn't really
stable, only the parent branches are.

-- 
Jens Axboe