lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Mon, 16 Mar 2020 16:31:08 +0100
From:   Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@...ha.franken.de>
To:     Kamal Dasu <kdasu.kdev@...il.com>
Cc:     Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
        linux-mips@...r.kernel.org, bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com,
        Ralf Baechle <ralf@...ux-mips.org>,
        Paul Burton <paulburton@...nel.org>,
        James Hogan <jhogan@...nel.org>,
        Jiaxun Yang <jiaxun.yang@...goat.com>,
        Huacai Chen <chenhc@...ote.com>,
        Mike Rapoport <rppt@...ux.ibm.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] MIPS: c-r4k: Invalidate BMIPS5000 ZSCM prefetch lines

On Thu, Mar 12, 2020 at 11:09:35PM -0400, Kamal Dasu wrote:
> This is needed on dma reads from device.  

ok.

> > On Mar 11, 2020, at 5:44 PM, Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@...ha.franken.de> wrote:
> > 
> > On Wed, Mar 11, 2020 at 01:54:23PM -0700, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> >>> On 2/7/20 2:33 PM, Kamal Dasu wrote:
> >>> Zephyr secondary cache is 256KB, 128B lines. 32B sectors. A secondary cache
> >>> line can contain two instruction cache lines (64B), or four data cache
> >>> lines (32B). Hardware prefetch Cache detects stream access, and prefetches
> >>> ahead of processor access. Add support to invalidate BMIPS5000 cpu zephyr
> >>> secondary cache module (ZSCM) on DMA from device so that data returned is
> >>> coherent during DMA read operations.
> >>> 
> >>> Signed-off-by: Kamal Dasu <kdasu.kdev@...il.com>

Applied to mips-next.

Thomas.

-- 
Crap can work. Given enough thrust pigs will fly, but it's not necessarily a
good idea.                                                [ RFC1925, 2.3 ]

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ