[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAAeHK+zvcvxxxGKEhBm3t8rWoyMMEoGYJPpaW3-3sk4__PYJJg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2020 14:45:56 +0100
From: Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@...gle.com>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>, Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
Cc: Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Felipe Balbi <balbi@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: build warnings after merge of the usb tree
On Tue, Mar 17, 2020 at 8:57 AM Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> After merging the usb tree, today's (actually yesterday's) linux-next
> build (powerpc allyesconfig) produced these warnings:
>
> ./usr/include/linux/usb/raw_gadget.h:74:12: warning: 'usb_raw_io_flags_zero' defined but not used [-Wunused-function]
> 74 | static int usb_raw_io_flags_zero(__u16 flags)
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> ./usr/include/linux/usb/raw_gadget.h:69:12: warning: 'usb_raw_io_flags_valid' defined but not used [-Wunused-function]
> 69 | static int usb_raw_io_flags_valid(__u16 flags)
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>
> Introduced by commit
>
> f2c2e717642c ("usb: gadget: add raw-gadget interface")
>
> Missing "inline" n a header file?
Hi Stephen,
Yes, same issue as reported here:
https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/linux/issues/934
Thanks for the report!
Greg, should I send a new version with the fix right now, or is it OK
to wait until we get comments from Felipe/Alan and then send a new
version?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists