linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 00/28] DT: Improve validation for Marvell SoCs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 17 Mar 2020 14:46:09 +0100
From:   Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To:     Lubomir Rintel <lkundrak@...sk>
Cc:     Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
        Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>,
        Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>,
        Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
        Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>,
        Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@...com>,
        Alessandro Zummo <a.zummo@...ertech.it>,
        Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
        Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
        Gregory Clement <gregory.clement@...tlin.com>,
        Daniel Mack <daniel@...que.org>,
        Haojian Zhuang <haojian.zhuang@...il.com>,
        Robert Jarzmik <robert.jarzmik@...e.fr>,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org, linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-media@...r.kernel.org, linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-rtc@...r.kernel.org, linux-serial@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-spi@...r.kernel.org, linux-usb@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/28] DT: Improve validation for Marvell SoCs

On Tue, Mar 17, 2020 at 10:38:54AM +0100, Lubomir Rintel wrote:
> Hello World,

Yah, that is an issue here. Marvell have a few different SoC families,
each with there own maintainers. Gregory and I tend to look after
'mvebu', aka orion5x, kirkwood, dove, berlin and a few others. All the
others are 'Somebody elses' problem'.

How do you think this patchset should get merged? Are we going to
split it up, just nominate one maintainer to merge the lot, or go
direct to arm-soc?

       Andrew