[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAD=FV=VLZ4RQQuji=1kKE5EnqrpY0M=U_G8XigAWAaZ8mxc=eg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2020 09:50:59 -0700
From: Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
To: Rajeshwari <rkambl@...eaurora.org>
Cc: Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
Amit Kucheria <amit.kucheria@...durent.com>,
linux-arm-msm <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>,
"open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS"
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
sivaa@...eaurora.org, Sandeep Maheswaram <sanm@...eaurora.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: dts: qcom: sc7180: Changed polling-delay in
Thermal-zones node
Hi,
On Tue, Mar 17, 2020 at 12:42 AM Rajeshwari <rkambl@...eaurora.org> wrote:
>
> Changed polling-delay and polling-delay-passive to zero as per
> the requirement.
>
> Signed-off-by: Rajeshwari <rkambl@...eaurora.org>
> ---
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7180.dtsi | 100 +++++++++++++++++------------------
> 1 file changed, 50 insertions(+), 50 deletions(-)
It probably wouldn't hurt to mention in the commit message that this
is because the thermal sensor interrupts are all hooked up and thus
the polling is not a useful thing to do. ...but other than that:
Reviewed-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists