lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 17 Mar 2020 12:21:33 +0200
From:   Luca Coelho <luca@...lho.fi>
To:     Jonathan McDowell <noodles@...th.li>,
        linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Intel Linux Wireless <linuxwifi@...el.com>,
        Ihab Zhaika <ihab.zhaika@...el.com>, johannes.berg@...el.com,
        emmanuel.grumbach@...el.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] iwlwifi: mvm: Avoid use of GEO_TX_POWER_LIMIT when not
 supported

On Sat, 2020-03-14 at 10:57 +0000, Jonathan McDowell wrote:
> Commit 39c1a9728f93 refactored the SAR table support and inadvertently
> added a call to GEO_TX_POWER_LIMIT without checking that the firmware
> supported it. This caused a regression for device + firmware
> combinations lacking the support. Add a check in iwl_mvm_sar_init to
> prevent this.
> 
> Fixes: 39c1a9728f93 (iwlwifi: refactor the SAR tables from mvm to acpi)
> Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=206395
> Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org # 5.5
> Signed-Off-By: Jonathan McDowell <noodles@...th.li>
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/mvm/fw.c b/drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/mvm/fw.c
> index 54c094e88474..4a8a4cb2c553 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/mvm/fw.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/mvm/fw.c
> @@ -1007,6 +1007,13 @@ static int iwl_mvm_sar_init(struct iwl_mvm *mvm)
>  	if (ret == -ENOENT)
>  		return 1;
>  
> +	/*
> +	 * If our firmware doesn't support GEO_TX_POWER_LIMIT then skip trying
> +	 * to use it.
> +	 */
> +	if (!iwl_sar_geo_support(&mvm->fwrt))
> +		return 1;
> +
>  	return ret;
>  }

Thanks, Jonathan! We already have an internal patch that fixes this 
(also fixes another symptom of the same bug).  I'll send it out now.

--
Cheers,
Luca.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists