[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200317112127.GA632169@arrakis.emea.arm.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2020 11:21:27 +0000
From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
To: Qais Yousef <qais.yousef@....com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"Paul E . McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 05/15] arm64: Don't use disable_nonboot_cpus()
On Sun, Feb 23, 2020 at 07:29:32PM +0000, Qais Yousef wrote:
> disable_nonboot_cpus() is not safe to use when doing machine_down(),
> because it relies on freeze_secondary_cpus() which in turn is
> a suspend/resume related freeze and could abort if the logic detects any
> pending activities that can prevent finishing the offlining process.
>
> Beside disable_nonboot_cpus() is dependent on CONFIG_PM_SLEEP_SMP which
> is an othogonal config to rely on to ensure this function works
> correctly.
>
> Use `reboot_cpu` variable instead of hardcoding 0 as the reboot cpu.
>
> Signed-off-by: Qais Yousef <qais.yousef@....com>
> CC: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
> CC: Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>
> CC: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
> CC: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
I'm not sure whether these patches have been queued already (still
unread in my inbox), so here it is:
Acked-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists