[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <DB3PR0402MB3916D27B3D860D8CD7441AA5F5F60@DB3PR0402MB3916.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2020 02:35:14 +0000
From: Anson Huang <anson.huang@....com>
To: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>, Peng Fan <peng.fan@....com>,
Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>
CC: Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
"s.hauer@...gutronix.de" <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
"kernel@...gutronix.de" <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
"festevam@...il.com" <festevam@...il.com>,
"dmitry.torokhov@...il.com" <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
"a.zummo@...ertech.it" <a.zummo@...ertech.it>,
"rui.zhang@...el.com" <rui.zhang@...el.com>,
"daniel.lezcano@...aro.org" <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
"amit.kucheria@...durent.com" <amit.kucheria@...durent.com>,
"wim@...ux-watchdog.org" <wim@...ux-watchdog.org>,
Daniel Baluta <daniel.baluta@....com>,
"gregkh@...uxfoundation.org" <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"linux@...pel-privat.de" <linux@...pel-privat.de>,
"tglx@...utronix.de" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"m.felsch@...gutronix.de" <m.felsch@...gutronix.de>,
"andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com"
<andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
"arnd@...db.de" <arnd@...db.de>,
"ronald@...ovation.ch" <ronald@...ovation.ch>,
"krzk@...nel.org" <krzk@...nel.org>,
"robh@...nel.org" <robh@...nel.org>,
Leonard Crestez <leonard.crestez@....com>,
Aisheng Dong <aisheng.dong@....com>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-input@...r.kernel.org" <linux-input@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-rtc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-rtc@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-pm@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org" <linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org>,
dl-linux-imx <linux-imx@....com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH V3 1/7] firmware: imx: Add stubs for !CONFIG_IMX_SCU case
> Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 1/7] firmware: imx: Add stubs for !CONFIG_IMX_SCU
> case
>
> On 3/16/20 7:18 PM, Peng Fan wrote:
> >> Subject: RE: [PATCH V3 1/7] firmware: imx: Add stubs for
> >> !CONFIG_IMX_SCU case
> >>
> >> Hi, Alexandre
> >>
> >>> -----Original Message-----
> >>> From: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>
> >>> Sent: Monday, March 16, 2020 5:16 PM
> >>> To: Anson Huang <anson.huang@....com>
> >>> Cc: Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>; Peng Fan
> <peng.fan@....com>;
> >>> s.hauer@...gutronix.de; kernel@...gutronix.de; festevam@...il.com;
> >>> dmitry.torokhov@...il.com; a.zummo@...ertech.it;
> >> rui.zhang@...el.com;
> >>> daniel.lezcano@...aro.org; amit.kucheria@...durent.com; wim@...ux-
> >>> watchdog.org; linux@...ck-us.net; Daniel Baluta
> >>> <daniel.baluta@....com>; gregkh@...uxfoundation.org;
> >>> linux@...pel-privat.de; tglx@...utronix.de; m.felsch@...gutronix.de;
> >>> andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com;
> >>> arnd@...db.de; ronald@...ovation.ch; krzk@...nel.org;
> >>> robh@...nel.org; Leonard Crestez <leonard.crestez@....com>; Aisheng
> >>> Dong <aisheng.dong@....com>; linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org;
> >>> linux- kernel@...r.kernel.org; linux-input@...r.kernel.org; linux-
> >>> rtc@...r.kernel.org; linux-pm@...r.kernel.org; linux-
> >>> watchdog@...r.kernel.org; dl-linux-imx <linux-imx@....com>
> >>> Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 1/7] firmware: imx: Add stubs for
> >>> !CONFIG_IMX_SCU case
> >>>
> >>> On 16/03/2020 09:08:53+0000, Anson Huang wrote:
> >>>>> Why do you absolutely need to compile them independently? From a
> >>>>> code coverage point of view, having:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> COMPILE_TEST=y
> >>>>> CONFIG_IMX_SCU=y
> >>>>>
> >>>>> is enough to select and compile the remaining drivers.
> >>>>
> >>>> What I meant is for below case, like using other arch config which
> >>>> does NOT have CONFIG_IMX_SCU selected, ONLY with COMPILE_TEST
> >>>> selected, adding stubs for IMX_SCU APIs can fix such scenario.
> >>>>
> >>>> COMPILE_TEST=y
> >>>> CONFIG_IMX_SCU=n
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>> Why is that an issue? If they don't have IMX_SCU selected, then the
> >>> other SCU driver are not selected either, having stubs doesn't
> >>> change that you will have to select at least one option. Please
> >>> explain what is the issue that is not solved here.
> >>
> >> OK, what I thought is even without IMX_SCU selected, other SCU
> >> drivers still can be selected for build test after adding
> >> "COMPILE_TEST" to the kconfig, like below, if without IMX_SCU API
> >> stubs, the "COMPILE_TEST" can NOT be added to SCU drivers to enable
> >> build test, so I think the IMX_SCU API stubs should be added?
> >
> > Forgot to mention, without stub api, for drivers with " #include
> > <linux/firmware/imx/sci.h> " will met compile error without
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_IMX_SCU
> > +#endif
> >
> > So we have to use ifdef CONFIG_IMX_SCU to guard the include.
> >
> Add "depends on IMX_SCU" to the Kconfig entry for those drivers, and/or
> drop "COMPILE_TEST" from their Kconfig entry.
>
> Really, COMPILE_TEST is abused here. I start to understand those who
> advocate that it should be removed. This is an excellent case in point.
Yup, COMPILE_TEST should ONLY be added to those independent drivers,
those drivers with dependency on "core" driver should NOT have it added.
SCU drivers are similar.
Anson
Powered by blists - more mailing lists