Message-ID: <CAMpxmJW770v6JLdveEe1hkgNEJByVyArhorSyUZBYOyFiVyOeg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 18 Mar 2020 10:14:16 +0100
From:   Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>
To:     Michael Walle <michael@...le.cc>
Cc:     linux-gpio <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-devicetree <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, linux-hwmon@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org,
        LINUXWATCHDOG <linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org>,
        arm-soc <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Jean Delvare <jdelvare@...e.com>,
        Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
        Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
        Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
        Uwe Kleine-König 
        <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>,
        Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@...ux-watchdog.org>,
        Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>, Li Yang <leoyang.li@....com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>,
        Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 12/18] gpio: add support for the sl28cpld GPIO controller

wt., 17 mar 2020 o 21:50 Michael Walle <michael@...le.cc> napisał(a):
>
> This adds support for the GPIO controller of the sl28 board management
> controller. This driver is part of a multi-function device.
>
> Signed-off-by: Michael Walle <michael@...le.cc>

Hi Michael,

thanks for the driver. Please take a look at some comments below.

> ---
>  drivers/gpio/Kconfig         |  11 ++
>  drivers/gpio/Makefile        |   1 +
>  drivers/gpio/gpio-sl28cpld.c | 332 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  3 files changed, 344 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 drivers/gpio/gpio-sl28cpld.c
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpio/Kconfig b/drivers/gpio/Kconfig
> index 3cbf8882a0dd..516e47017ef5 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpio/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/gpio/Kconfig
> @@ -1211,6 +1211,17 @@ config GPIO_RC5T583
>           This driver provides the support for driving/reading the gpio pins
>           of RC5T583 device through standard gpio library.
>
> +config GPIO_SL28CPLD
> +       tristate "Kontron sl28 GPIO"
> +       depends on MFD_SL28CPLD
> +       depends on OF_GPIO
> +       select GPIOLIB_IRQCHIP

Please see below - I think both are not needed.

> +       help
> +         This enables support for the GPIOs found on the Kontron sl28 CPLD.
> +
> +         This driver can also be built as a module. If so, the module will be
> +         called gpio-sl28cpld.
> +
>  config GPIO_STMPE
>         bool "STMPE GPIOs"
>         depends on MFD_STMPE
> diff --git a/drivers/gpio/Makefile b/drivers/gpio/Makefile
> index 0b571264ddbc..0ca2d52c78e8 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpio/Makefile
> +++ b/drivers/gpio/Makefile
> @@ -127,6 +127,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_GPIO_SCH311X)          += gpio-sch311x.o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_GPIO_SCH)                 += gpio-sch.o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_GPIO_SIFIVE)              += gpio-sifive.o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_GPIO_SIOX)                        += gpio-siox.o
> +obj-$(CONFIG_GPIO_SL28CPLD)            += gpio-sl28cpld.o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_GPIO_SODAVILLE)           += gpio-sodaville.o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_GPIO_SPEAR_SPICS)         += gpio-spear-spics.o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_GPIO_SPRD)                        += gpio-sprd.o
> diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-sl28cpld.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-sl28cpld.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..94f82013882f
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-sl28cpld.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,332 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
> +/*
> + * SMARC-sAL28 GPIO driver.
> + *
> + * Copyright 2019 Kontron Europe GmbH
> + */
> +
> +#include <linux/kernel.h>
> +#include <linux/module.h>
> +#include <linux/of.h>
> +#include <linux/of_device.h>
> +#include <linux/of_address.h>
> +#include <linux/interrupt.h>
> +#include <linux/regmap.h>
> +#include <linux/platform_device.h>
> +#include <linux/gpio/driver.h>
> +
> +#define GPIO_REG_DIR   0
> +#define GPIO_REG_OUT   1
> +#define GPIO_REG_IN    2
> +#define GPIO_REG_IE    3
> +#define GPIO_REG_IP    4

These values would be more clear if they were defined as hex.

> +
> +#define GPI_REG_IN     0
> +
> +#define GPO_REG_OUT    0

Please also use a common prefix even for defines.

> +
> +enum sl28cpld_gpio_type {
> +       sl28cpld_gpio,
> +       sl28cpld_gpi,
> +       sl28cpld_gpo,
> +};

Enum values should be all upper-case.

> +
> +struct sl28cpld_gpio {
> +       struct gpio_chip gpio_chip;
> +       struct irq_chip irq_chip;
> +       struct regmap *regmap;
> +       u32 offset;
> +       struct mutex lock;
> +       u8 ie;
> +};
> +
> +static void sl28cpld_gpio_set_reg(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned int reg,
> +                                 unsigned int offset, int value)
> +{
> +       struct sl28cpld_gpio *gpio = gpiochip_get_data(chip);
> +       unsigned int mask = 1 << offset;
> +       unsigned int val = value << offset;
> +
> +       regmap_update_bits(gpio->regmap, gpio->offset + reg, mask, val);
> +}
> +
> +static void sl28cpld_gpio_set(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned int offset,
> +                             int value)
> +{
> +       sl28cpld_gpio_set_reg(chip, GPIO_REG_OUT, offset, value);
> +}
> +
> +static void sl28cpld_gpo_set(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned int offset,
> +                            int value)
> +{
> +       sl28cpld_gpio_set_reg(chip, GPO_REG_OUT, offset, value);
> +}
> +
> +static int sl28cpld_gpio_get_reg(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned int reg,
> +                                unsigned int offset)
> +{
> +       struct sl28cpld_gpio *gpio = gpiochip_get_data(chip);
> +       unsigned int mask = 1 << offset;
> +       unsigned int val;
> +       int ret;
> +
> +       ret = regmap_read(gpio->regmap, gpio->offset + reg, &val);
> +       if (ret)
> +               return ret;
> +
> +       return (val & mask) ? 1 : 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int sl28cpld_gpio_get(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned int offset)
> +{
> +       return sl28cpld_gpio_get_reg(chip, GPIO_REG_IN, offset);
> +}
> +
> +static int sl28cpld_gpi_get(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned int offset)
> +{
> +       return sl28cpld_gpio_get_reg(chip, GPI_REG_IN, offset);
> +}
> +
> +static int sl28cpld_gpio_get_direction(struct gpio_chip *chip,
> +                                      unsigned int offset)
> +{
> +       struct sl28cpld_gpio *gpio = gpiochip_get_data(chip);
> +       unsigned int reg;
> +       int ret;
> +
> +       ret = regmap_read(gpio->regmap, gpio->offset + GPIO_REG_DIR, &reg);
> +       if (ret)
> +               return ret;
> +
> +       if (reg & (1 << offset))
> +               return GPIO_LINE_DIRECTION_OUT;
> +       else
> +               return GPIO_LINE_DIRECTION_IN;
> +}
> +
> +static int sl28cpld_gpio_set_direction(struct gpio_chip *chip,
> +                                      unsigned int offset,
> +                                      bool output)
> +{
> +       struct sl28cpld_gpio *gpio = gpiochip_get_data(chip);
> +       unsigned int mask = 1 << offset;
> +       unsigned int val = (output) ? mask : 0;
> +
> +       return regmap_update_bits(gpio->regmap, gpio->offset + GPIO_REG_DIR,
> +                                 mask, val);
> +

Stray newline.

> +}
> +
> +static int sl28cpld_gpio_direction_input(struct gpio_chip *chip,
> +                                        unsigned int offset)
> +{
> +       return sl28cpld_gpio_set_direction(chip, offset, false);
> +}
> +
> +static int sl28cpld_gpio_direction_output(struct gpio_chip *chip,
> +                                         unsigned int offset, int value)
> +{
> +       sl28cpld_gpio_set_reg(chip, GPIO_REG_OUT, offset, value);
> +       return sl28cpld_gpio_set_direction(chip, offset, true);
> +}
> +
> +static void sl28cpld_gpio_irq_lock(struct irq_data *data)
> +{
> +       struct sl28cpld_gpio *gpio =
> +               gpiochip_get_data(irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(data));
> +
> +       mutex_lock(&gpio->lock);

How does that actually lock anything? Regmap uses a different lock and
if you want to make sure nobody modifies the GPIO registers than you'd
need to use the same lock. Also: this looks a lot like a task for
regmap_irqchip - maybe you could use it here or in the core mfd
module?

> +}
> +
> +static void sl28cpld_gpio_irq_sync_unlock(struct irq_data *data)
> +{
> +       struct sl28cpld_gpio *gpio =
> +               gpiochip_get_data(irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(data));
> +
> +       regmap_write(gpio->regmap, gpio->offset + GPIO_REG_IE, gpio->ie);
> +       mutex_unlock(&gpio->lock);
> +}
> +
> +static void sl28cpld_gpio_irq_disable(struct irq_data *data)
> +{
> +       struct sl28cpld_gpio *gpio =
> +               gpiochip_get_data(irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(data));
> +
> +       if (data->hwirq >= 8)
> +               return;
> +
> +       gpio->ie &= ~(1 << data->hwirq);
> +}
> +
> +static void sl28cpld_gpio_irq_enable(struct irq_data *data)
> +{
> +       struct sl28cpld_gpio *gpio =
> +               gpiochip_get_data(irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(data));
> +
> +       if (data->hwirq >= 8)
> +               return;
> +
> +       gpio->ie |= (1 << data->hwirq);
> +}
> +
> +static int sl28cpld_gpio_irq_set_type(struct irq_data *data, unsigned int type)
> +{
> +       /* only edge triggered interrupts on both edges are supported */
> +       return (type == IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_BOTH) ? 0 : -EINVAL;
> +}
> +
> +static irqreturn_t sl28cpld_gpio_irq_thread(int irq, void *data)
> +{
> +       struct sl28cpld_gpio *gpio = data;
> +       unsigned int ip;
> +       unsigned int virq;
> +       int pin;
> +       int ret;
> +
> +       ret = regmap_read(gpio->regmap, gpio->offset + GPIO_REG_IP, &ip);
> +       if (ret)
> +               return IRQ_NONE;
> +
> +       /* mask other pending interrupts which are not enabled */
> +       ip &= gpio->ie;
> +
> +       /* ack the interrupts */
> +       regmap_write(gpio->regmap, gpio->offset + GPIO_REG_IP, ip);
> +
> +       /* and handle them */
> +       while (ip) {
> +               pin = __ffs(ip);
> +               ip &= ~BIT(pin);
> +
> +               virq = irq_find_mapping(gpio->gpio_chip.irq.domain, pin);
> +               if (virq)
> +                       handle_nested_irq(virq);
> +       }
> +
> +       return IRQ_HANDLED;
> +}

This definitely looks like parts of regmap_irqchip reimplemented.
Please check if you could reuse it - it would save a lot of code.

> +
> +static int sl28_cpld_gpio_irq_init(struct platform_device *pdev, int irq)
> +{
> +       struct sl28cpld_gpio *gpio = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
> +       struct irq_chip *irq_chip = &gpio->irq_chip;
> +       int ret;
> +
> +       irq_chip->name = "sl28cpld-gpio-irq",
> +       irq_chip->irq_bus_lock = sl28cpld_gpio_irq_lock,
> +       irq_chip->irq_bus_sync_unlock = sl28cpld_gpio_irq_sync_unlock,
> +       irq_chip->irq_disable = sl28cpld_gpio_irq_disable,
> +       irq_chip->irq_enable = sl28cpld_gpio_irq_enable,
> +       irq_chip->irq_set_type = sl28cpld_gpio_irq_set_type,
> +       irq_chip->flags = IRQCHIP_SKIP_SET_WAKE,
> +
> +       ret = gpiochip_irqchip_add_nested(&gpio->gpio_chip, irq_chip, 0,
> +                                         handle_simple_irq, IRQ_TYPE_NONE);
> +       if (ret)
> +               return ret;
> +
> +       ret = devm_request_threaded_irq(&pdev->dev, irq, NULL,
> +                                       sl28cpld_gpio_irq_thread,
> +                                       IRQF_SHARED | IRQF_ONESHOT,
> +                                       pdev->name, gpio);
> +       if (ret)
> +               return ret;
> +
> +       gpiochip_set_nested_irqchip(&gpio->gpio_chip, irq_chip, irq);
> +
> +       return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int sl28cpld_gpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> +{
> +       enum sl28cpld_gpio_type type =
> +               platform_get_device_id(pdev)->driver_data;
> +       struct device_node *np = pdev->dev.of_node;
> +       struct sl28cpld_gpio *gpio;
> +       struct gpio_chip *chip;
> +       struct resource *res;
> +       bool irq_support = false;
> +       int ret;
> +       int irq;
> +
> +       gpio = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*gpio), GFP_KERNEL);
> +       if (!gpio)
> +               return -ENOMEM;
> +
> +       if (!pdev->dev.parent)
> +               return -ENODEV;

Why not check this before allocating any memory?

> +
> +       gpio->regmap = dev_get_regmap(pdev->dev.parent, NULL);
> +       if (!gpio->regmap)
> +               return -ENODEV;
> +
> +       res = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_REG, 0);
> +       if (!res)
> +               return -EINVAL;
> +       gpio->offset = res->start;
> +

This isn't how IO resources are used. What are you trying to achieve here?

> +       /* initialize struct gpio_chip */
> +       mutex_init(&gpio->lock);
> +       chip = &gpio->gpio_chip;
> +       chip->parent = &pdev->dev;
> +       chip->label = dev_name(&pdev->dev);
> +       chip->owner = THIS_MODULE;
> +       chip->can_sleep = true;
> +       chip->base = -1;
> +       chip->ngpio = 8;
> +
> +       switch (type) {
> +       case sl28cpld_gpio:
> +               chip->get_direction = sl28cpld_gpio_get_direction;
> +               chip->direction_input = sl28cpld_gpio_direction_input;
> +               chip->direction_output = sl28cpld_gpio_direction_output;
> +               chip->get = sl28cpld_gpio_get;
> +               chip->set = sl28cpld_gpio_set;
> +               irq_support = true;
> +               break;
> +       case sl28cpld_gpo:
> +               chip->set = sl28cpld_gpo_set;
> +               chip->get = sl28cpld_gpi_get;
> +               break;
> +       case sl28cpld_gpi:
> +               chip->get = sl28cpld_gpi_get;
> +               break;
> +       }
> +
> +       ret = devm_gpiochip_add_data(&pdev->dev, chip, gpio);
> +       if (ret < 0)
> +               return ret;
> +
> +       platform_set_drvdata(pdev, gpio);
> +
> +       if (irq_support && of_property_read_bool(np, "interrupt-controller")) {

You're depending on OF_GPIO for this one function. Please switch to
device_property_read_bool() instead.

> +               irq = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0);
> +               if (irq < 0)
> +                       return ret;
> +
> +               ret = sl28_cpld_gpio_irq_init(pdev, irq);
> +               if (ret)
> +                       return ret;
> +       }
> +
> +       return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static const struct platform_device_id sl28cpld_gpio_id_table[] = {
> +       {"sl28cpld-gpio", sl28cpld_gpio},
> +       {"sl28cpld-gpi", sl28cpld_gpi},
> +       {"sl28cpld-gpo", sl28cpld_gpo},

Could you explain this a bit more? Is this the same component with
input/output-only lines or three different components?

> +};
> +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(platform, sl28cpld_gpio_id_table);
> +
> +static struct platform_driver sl28cpld_gpio_driver = {
> +       .probe = sl28cpld_gpio_probe,
> +       .id_table = sl28cpld_gpio_id_table,
> +       .driver = {
> +               .name = "sl28cpld-gpio",
> +       },
> +};
> +module_platform_driver(sl28cpld_gpio_driver);
> +
> +MODULE_DESCRIPTION("sl28cpld GPIO Driver");
> +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");

I think you could use a MODULE_ALIAS() here if you want this module to
be loaded automatically by udev.

> --
> 2.20.1
>

Best regards,
Bartosz Golaszewski

Powered by blists - more mailing lists