linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] docs: locking: Add 'need' to hardirq section

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 18 Mar 2020 08:55:42 -0600
From:   Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
To:     Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] docs: locking: Add 'need' to hardirq section

On Tue, 17 Mar 2020 22:44:25 -0700
Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org> wrote:

> Add the missing word to make this sentence read properly.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org>
> ---
>  Documentation/kernel-hacking/locking.rst | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/kernel-hacking/locking.rst b/Documentation/kernel-hacking/locking.rst
> index a8518ac0d31d..9850c1e52607 100644
> --- a/Documentation/kernel-hacking/locking.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/kernel-hacking/locking.rst
> @@ -263,7 +263,7 @@ by a hardware interrupt on another CPU. This is where
>  interrupts on that cpu, then grab the lock.
>  :c:func:`spin_unlock_irq()` does the reverse.
>  
> -The irq handler does not to use :c:func:`spin_lock_irq()`, because
> +The irq handler does not need to use :c:func:`spin_lock_irq()`, because

Please take out the :c:func: stuff while you're at it, we don't need that
anymore.  Just spin_lock_irq() will do the right thing.

Thanks,

jon