[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200318145600.GA20301@lxhi-065.adit-jv.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2020 15:56:00 +0100
From: Eugeniu Rosca <erosca@...adit-jv.com>
To: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
CC: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
John Ogness <john.ogness@...utronix.de>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>,
Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Jisheng Zhang <Jisheng.Zhang@...aptics.com>,
Valdis Kletnieks <valdis.kletnieks@...edu>,
Andrew Gabbasov <andrew_gabbasov@...tor.com>,
Dirk Behme <dirk.behme@...bosch.com>,
Eugeniu Rosca <erosca@...adit-jv.com>,
Eugeniu Rosca <roscaeugeniu@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/3] Fix quiet console in pre-panic scenarios
Hi Sebastian,
Cc: John Ogness
On Mon, Mar 16, 2020 at 08:09:48PM +0100, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> On 2020-03-16 14:35:17 [-0400], Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > I don't see any issues with this patch set. What do others think?
> >
> > Acked-by: Steven Rostedt (VMware) <rostedt@...dmis.org>
> >
> > [ Note, I only acked, and did not give a deep review of it ]
>
> What is the state of the other larger printk rework? If this does not
> solve any -stable related issues then it will be replaced?
Is this a question to John and his most recent series in
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200128161948.8524-1-john.ogness@linutronix.de/
?
Is there any upstream agreement to already keep the current printk
mechanism away from any updates?
--
Best Regards
Eugeniu Rosca
Powered by blists - more mailing lists