[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <218eed57-27c8-12c0-6f5f-111874798c21@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2020 15:00:35 -0400
From: Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>
To: Qian Cai <cai@....pw>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc: "Joel Fernandes (Google)" <joel@...lfernandes.org>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>, rcu@...r.kernel.org,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
Subject: Re: Hard lockups due to "tick/common: Make tick_periodic() check for
missing ticks"
On 3/19/20 9:58 AM, Qian Cai wrote:
>
>> On Mar 6, 2020, at 10:33 PM, Qian Cai <cai@....pw> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>> On Mar 5, 2020, at 11:06 PM, Qian Cai <cai@....pw> wrote:
>>>
>> Using this config,
>>
>>> https://raw.githubusercontent.com/cailca/linux-mm/master/x86.config
>> Reverted the linux-next commit d441dceb5dce (“tick/common: Make tick_periodic() check for missing ticks”)
>> fixed the lockup that could easily happen during boot.
>
> Thomas or Stephen, can you back out this patch from linux-next while Waiman is getting to the bottom of it?
> I can still reproduce it as today.
I am fine for reverting the patch for now. I am still having some
trouble reproducing it and I have other tasks to work on right now. I
will get to the bottom of it and resubmit a new patch later on.
Cheers,
Longman
Powered by blists - more mailing lists