[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200320130017.6457a1e8@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2020 13:00:17 +1100
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To: Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>
Cc: Qian Cai <cai@....pw>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"Joel Fernandes (Google)" <joel@...lfernandes.org>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>, rcu@...r.kernel.org,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
Subject: Re: Hard lockups due to "tick/common: Make tick_periodic() check
for missing ticks"
Hi all,
On Thu, 19 Mar 2020 15:00:35 -0400 Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com> wrote:
>
> On 3/19/20 9:58 AM, Qian Cai wrote:
> >
> >> On Mar 6, 2020, at 10:33 PM, Qian Cai <cai@....pw> wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>> On Mar 5, 2020, at 11:06 PM, Qian Cai <cai@....pw> wrote:
> >>>
> >> Using this config,
> >>
> >>> https://raw.githubusercontent.com/cailca/linux-mm/master/x86.config
> >> Reverted the linux-next commit d441dceb5dce (“tick/common: Make tick_periodic() check for missing ticks”)
> >> fixed the lockup that could easily happen during boot.
> >
> > Thomas or Stephen, can you back out this patch from linux-next while Waiman is getting to the bottom of it?
> > I can still reproduce it as today.
>
> I am fine for reverting the patch for now. I am still having some
> trouble reproducing it and I have other tasks to work on right now. I
> will get to the bottom of it and resubmit a new patch later on.
I have reverted that commit from linux-next today.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists