linux-kernel - Re: Hard lockups due to "tick/common: Make tick

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 20 Mar 2020 12:50:12 +0100
From:   Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To:     Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
        Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>
Cc:     Qian Cai <cai@....pw>,
        "Joel Fernandes \(Google\)" <joel@...lfernandes.org>,
        "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>, rcu@...r.kernel.org,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
        Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
Subject: Re: Hard lockups due to "tick/common: Make tick_periodic() check for missing ticks"

Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> writes:
 Thu, 19 Mar 2020 15:00:35 -0400 Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com> wrote:
>> I am fine for reverting the patch for now. I am still having some
>> trouble reproducing it and I have other tasks to work on right now. I
>> will get to the bottom of it and resubmit a new patch later on.
>
> I have reverted that commit from linux-next today.

I did the same in the tip tree.