linux-kernel - Re: [locks] 6d390e4b5d: will-it-scale.per_process

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAHk-=whAWFw5vZB-krqUteHuAYCYypKG6683WEydOynBizpixQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Thu, 19 Mar 2020 12:35:14 -0700
From:   Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To:     Jeff Layton <jlayton@...nel.org>
Cc:     NeilBrown <neilb@...e.de>, yangerkun <yangerkun@...wei.com>,
        kernel test robot <rong.a.chen@...el.com>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, lkp@...ts.01.org,
        Bruce Fields <bfields@...ldses.org>,
        Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [locks] 6d390e4b5d: will-it-scale.per_process_ops -96.6% regression

On Thu, Mar 19, 2020 at 12:24 PM Jeff Layton <jlayton@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> >
> > If you have other things, send me a pull request, otherwise just let
> > me know and I'll apply the patch directly.
>
> That's it for now.

Lol. You confused me with your question of whether I wanted a pull
request or not.

I had already applied the patch as dcf23ac3e846 ("locks: reinstate
locks_delete_block optimization") yesterday ;)

            Linus