linux-kernel - Re: [locks] 6d390e4b5d: will-it-scale.per_process

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <815c83462125f350b61163f682fb674e515e954e.camel@kernel.org>
Date:   Thu, 19 Mar 2020 16:10:12 -0400
From:   Jeff Layton <jlayton@...nel.org>
To:     Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:     NeilBrown <neilb@...e.de>, yangerkun <yangerkun@...wei.com>,
        kernel test robot <rong.a.chen@...el.com>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, lkp@...ts.01.org,
        Bruce Fields <bfields@...ldses.org>,
        Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [locks] 6d390e4b5d: will-it-scale.per_process_ops -96.6%
 regression

On Thu, 2020-03-19 at 12:35 -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 19, 2020 at 12:24 PM Jeff Layton <jlayton@...nel.org> wrote:
> > > If you have other things, send me a pull request, otherwise just let
> > > me know and I'll apply the patch directly.
> > 
> > That's it for now.
> 
> Lol. You confused me with your question of whether I wanted a pull
> request or not.
> 
> I had already applied the patch as dcf23ac3e846 ("locks: reinstate
> locks_delete_block optimization") yesterday ;)
> 

Sorry about that! I did a pull this morning and didn't see it, you must
have pushed afterward. Thanks again for picking it up.

-- 
Jeff Layton <jlayton@...nel.org>