lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Fri, 20 Mar 2020 11:34:11 -0700
From:   Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>
To:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>
CC:     Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
        Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com>,
        Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>,
        Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@...com>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        <bpf@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Maciej Żenczykowski <maze@...gle.com>,
        John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>,
        Alexander Potapenko <glider@...gle.com>,
        Alistair Delva <adelva@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] bpf: explicitly memset some bpf info structures declared
 on the stack



On 3/20/20 9:22 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> Trying to initialize a structure with "= {};" will not always clean out
> all padding locations in a structure.  So be explicit and call memset to
> initialize everything for a number of bpf information structures that
> are then copied from userspace, sometimes from smaller memory locations
> than the size of the structure.
> 
> Reported-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net
> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>

Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>

Powered by blists - more mailing lists