linux-kernel - [PATCH] bpf: explicitly memset some bpf info structures declared on the stack

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 20 Mar 2020 17:22:58 +0100
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>
Cc:     Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
        Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com>,
        Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>, Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>,
        Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@...com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        bpf@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Maciej Żenczykowski <maze@...gle.com>,
        John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>,
        Alexander Potapenko <glider@...gle.com>,
        Alistair Delva <adelva@...gle.com>
Subject: [PATCH] bpf: explicitly memset some bpf info structures declared on
 the stack

Trying to initialize a structure with "= {};" will not always clean out
all padding locations in a structure.  So be explicit and call memset to
initialize everything for a number of bpf information structures that
are then copied from userspace, sometimes from smaller memory locations
than the size of the structure.

Reported-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---

Note, this is separate from my previous patch, both are needed.

 kernel/bpf/btf.c     | 3 ++-
 kernel/bpf/syscall.c | 6 ++++--
 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/bpf/btf.c b/kernel/bpf/btf.c
index 787140095e58..2fc945fcf952 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/btf.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/btf.c
@@ -4564,7 +4564,7 @@ int btf_get_info_by_fd(const struct btf *btf,
 		       union bpf_attr __user *uattr)
 {
 	struct bpf_btf_info __user *uinfo;
-	struct bpf_btf_info info = {};
+	struct bpf_btf_info info;
 	u32 info_copy, btf_copy;
 	void __user *ubtf;
 	u32 uinfo_len;
@@ -4573,6 +4573,7 @@ int btf_get_info_by_fd(const struct btf *btf,
 	uinfo_len = attr->info.info_len;
 
 	info_copy = min_t(u32, uinfo_len, sizeof(info));
+	memset(&info, 0, sizeof(info));
 	if (copy_from_user(&info, uinfo, info_copy))
 		return -EFAULT;
 
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
index a4b1de8ea409..84213cc5d016 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
@@ -2787,7 +2787,7 @@ static int bpf_prog_get_info_by_fd(struct bpf_prog *prog,
 				   union bpf_attr __user *uattr)
 {
 	struct bpf_prog_info __user *uinfo = u64_to_user_ptr(attr->info.info);
-	struct bpf_prog_info info = {};
+	struct bpf_prog_info info;
 	u32 info_len = attr->info.info_len;
 	struct bpf_prog_stats stats;
 	char __user *uinsns;
@@ -2799,6 +2799,7 @@ static int bpf_prog_get_info_by_fd(struct bpf_prog *prog,
 		return err;
 	info_len = min_t(u32, sizeof(info), info_len);
 
+	memset(&info, 0, sizeof(info));
 	if (copy_from_user(&info, uinfo, info_len))
 		return -EFAULT;
 
@@ -3062,7 +3063,7 @@ static int bpf_map_get_info_by_fd(struct bpf_map *map,
 				  union bpf_attr __user *uattr)
 {
 	struct bpf_map_info __user *uinfo = u64_to_user_ptr(attr->info.info);
-	struct bpf_map_info info = {};
+	struct bpf_map_info info;
 	u32 info_len = attr->info.info_len;
 	int err;
 
@@ -3071,6 +3072,7 @@ static int bpf_map_get_info_by_fd(struct bpf_map *map,
 		return err;
 	info_len = min_t(u32, sizeof(info), info_len);
 
+	memset(&info, 0, sizeof(info));
 	info.type = map->map_type;
 	info.id = map->id;
 	info.key_size = map->key_size;
-- 
2.25.2