[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200320132248.44b81b3b@bahia.lan>
Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2020 13:22:48 +0100
From: Greg Kurz <groug@...d.org>
To: Laurent Dufour <ldufour@...ux.ibm.com>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kvm-ppc@...r.kernel.org, Bharata B Rao <bharata@...ux.ibm.com>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...abs.org>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] KVM: PPC: Book3S HV: check caller of H_SVM_* Hcalls
On Fri, 20 Mar 2020 11:26:42 +0100
Laurent Dufour <ldufour@...ux.ibm.com> wrote:
> The Hcall named H_SVM_* are reserved to the Ultravisor. However, nothing
> prevent a malicious VM or SVM to call them. This could lead to weird result
> and should be filtered out.
>
> Checking the Secure bit of the calling MSR ensure that the call is coming
> from either the Ultravisor or a SVM. But any system call made from a SVM
> are going through the Ultravisor, and the Ultravisor should filter out
> these malicious call. This way, only the Ultravisor is able to make such a
> Hcall.
"Ultravisor should filter" ? And what if it doesn't (eg. because of a bug) ?
Shouldn't we also check the HV bit of the calling MSR as well to
disambiguate SVM and UV ?
>
> Cc: Bharata B Rao <bharata@...ux.ibm.com>
> Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@...abs.org>
> Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>
> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>
> Signed-off-by: Laurent Dufour <ldufour@...ux.ibm.com>
> ---
> arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv.c | 32 +++++++++++++++++++++-----------
> 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv.c b/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv.c
> index 33be4d93248a..43773182a737 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv.c
> @@ -1074,25 +1074,35 @@ int kvmppc_pseries_do_hcall(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> kvmppc_get_gpr(vcpu, 6));
> break;
> case H_SVM_PAGE_IN:
> - ret = kvmppc_h_svm_page_in(vcpu->kvm,
> - kvmppc_get_gpr(vcpu, 4),
> - kvmppc_get_gpr(vcpu, 5),
> - kvmppc_get_gpr(vcpu, 6));
> + ret = H_UNSUPPORTED;
> + if (kvmppc_get_srr1(vcpu) & MSR_S)
> + ret = kvmppc_h_svm_page_in(vcpu->kvm,
> + kvmppc_get_gpr(vcpu, 4),
> + kvmppc_get_gpr(vcpu, 5),
> + kvmppc_get_gpr(vcpu, 6));
If calling kvmppc_h_svm_page_in() produces a "weird result" when
the MSR_S bit isn't set, then I think it should do the checking
itself, ie. pass vcpu.
This would also prevent adding that many lines in kvmppc_pseries_do_hcall()
which is a big enough function already. The checking could be done in a
helper in book3s_hv_uvmem.c and used by all UV specific hcalls.
> break;
> case H_SVM_PAGE_OUT:
> - ret = kvmppc_h_svm_page_out(vcpu->kvm,
> - kvmppc_get_gpr(vcpu, 4),
> - kvmppc_get_gpr(vcpu, 5),
> - kvmppc_get_gpr(vcpu, 6));
> + ret = H_UNSUPPORTED;
> + if (kvmppc_get_srr1(vcpu) & MSR_S)
> + ret = kvmppc_h_svm_page_out(vcpu->kvm,
> + kvmppc_get_gpr(vcpu, 4),
> + kvmppc_get_gpr(vcpu, 5),
> + kvmppc_get_gpr(vcpu, 6));
> break;
> case H_SVM_INIT_START:
> - ret = kvmppc_h_svm_init_start(vcpu->kvm);
> + ret = H_UNSUPPORTED;
> + if (kvmppc_get_srr1(vcpu) & MSR_S)
> + ret = kvmppc_h_svm_init_start(vcpu->kvm);
> break;
> case H_SVM_INIT_DONE:
> - ret = kvmppc_h_svm_init_done(vcpu->kvm);
> + ret = H_UNSUPPORTED;
> + if (kvmppc_get_srr1(vcpu) & MSR_S)
> + ret = kvmppc_h_svm_init_done(vcpu->kvm);
> break;
> case H_SVM_INIT_ABORT:
> - ret = kvmppc_h_svm_init_abort(vcpu->kvm);
> + ret = H_UNSUPPORTED;
> + if (kvmppc_get_srr1(vcpu) & MSR_S)
> + ret = kvmppc_h_svm_init_abort(vcpu->kvm);
> break;
>
> default:
Powered by blists - more mailing lists