[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200321051942.GB5063@builder>
Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2020 22:19:42 -0700
From: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>
To: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>
Cc: Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Rob Clark <robdclark@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] arm64: dts: qcom: db820c: Add s2 regulator in pmi8994
On Fri 20 Mar 16:33 PDT 2020, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> Quoting Bjorn Andersson (2020-03-18 22:39:01)
> > From: Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@...eaurora.org>
> >
> > Add the SPMI regulator node in the PMI8994, use it to give us VDD_GX
> > at a fixed max nominal voltage for the db820c and specify this as supply
> > for the MMSS GPU_GX GDSC.
> >
> > With the introduction of CPR support the range for VDD_GX should be
> > expanded.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@...eaurora.org>
> > [bjorn: Split between pmi8994 and db820c, changed voltage, rewrote commit message]
> > Signed-off-by: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>
> > ---
>
> These two dts patches don't need to go through clk tree right? And the
> first patch can be applied and regulator core will just return us a
> dummy supply so it's safe to apply now?
Right, the two pairs can be merged completely independently; we just
need to agree on the _ vs -
Regards,
Bjorn
Powered by blists - more mailing lists