[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1a6f0ba0-c49c-c547-1252-eed404655f43@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 22 Mar 2020 17:14:54 +0100
From: Johan Jonker <jbx6244@...il.com>
To: unlisted-recipients:; (no To-header on input)
Cc: devicetree@...r.kernel.org, heiko@...ech.de,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org, robh+dt@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: dts: rockchip: fix defines in pd_vio node for
rk3399
Hi,
Why is 'pd_tcpc0, pd_tcpc1' grouped under 'pd_vio' instead of VD_LOGIC?
Thanks
On 3/22/20 4:45 PM, Johan Jonker wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The RK3399 TRM uses both
>
> 'pd_tcpc0, pd_tcpc1'
>
> as
>
> 'pd_tcpd0, pd_tcpd1'.
>
> What should we use here?
>
> Thanks.
>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399.dtsi
>> index 8aac201f0..3dc8fe620 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399.dtsi
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399.dtsi
>> @@ -1087,12 +1087,12 @@
>> pm_qos = <&qos_isp1_m0>,
>> <&qos_isp1_m1>;
>> };
>> - pd_tcpc0@...399_PD_TCPC0 {
>> + pd_tcpc0@...399_PD_TCPD0 {
>> reg = <RK3399_PD_TCPD0>;
>> clocks = <&cru SCLK_UPHY0_TCPDCORE>,
>> <&cru SCLK_UPHY0_TCPDPHY_REF>;
>> };
>> - pd_tcpc1@...399_PD_TCPC1 {
>> + pd_tcpc1@...399_PD_TCPD1 {
>> reg = <RK3399_PD_TCPD1>;
>> clocks = <&cru SCLK_UPHY1_TCPDCORE>,
>> <&cru SCLK_UPHY1_TCPDPHY_REF>;
>> --
>> 2.11.0
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists