lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2020 09:38:44 -0700 From: mark gross <mgross@...ux.intel.com> To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de> Cc: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, "maintainer:X86 ARCHITECTURE (32-BIT AND 64-BIT)" <x86@...nel.org>, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>, Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>, ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>, Darren Hart <dvhart@...radead.org>, Andy Shevchenko <andy@...radead.org>, Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>, Linux PM <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>, Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com>, linux-edac@...r.kernel.org, Platform Driver <platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org>, Jean Delvare <jdelvare@...e.com>, Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>, linux-hwmon@...r.kernel.org, Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@...el.com>, Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>, Amit Kucheria <amit.kucheria@...durent.com>, Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@...sung.com>, Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@...ux.intel.com>, Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>, Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>, linux-mmc <linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org>, Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.com>, ALSA Development Mailing List <alsa-devel@...a-project.org>, Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, linux-crypto <linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org> Subject: Re: [patch 08/22] ACPI: Convert to new X86 CPU match macros On Fri, Mar 20, 2020 at 09:32:26PM +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com> writes: > > > On Fri, Mar 20, 2020 at 3:19 PM Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de> wrote: > >> > >> The new macro set has a consistent namespace and uses C99 initializers > >> instead of the grufty C89 ones. > >> > >> Rename the local macro wrapper to X86_MATCH for consistency. It stays for > >> readability sake. > > > >> + X86_MATCH_INTEL_FAM6_MODEL(ATOM_SILVERMONT, NULL), > >> + X86_MATCH_INTEL_FAM6_MODEL(ATOM_AIRMONT, NULL), > > > >> -#define ICPU(model) { X86_VENDOR_INTEL, 6, model, X86_FEATURE_ANY, } > >> +#define X86_MATCH(model) X86_MATCH_INTEL_FAM6_MODEL(model, NULL) > > > > Maybe we can do a generic macro to avoid all these ', NULL' repetitions? > > I opted for having the data argument everywhere to keep the macro maze > small. And we have enough places where data is actually used. +1 --mark > Thanks, > > tglx
Powered by blists - more mailing lists