linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3] x86: Alias memset to __builtin

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <fdcd36df-e2a2-b8b8-abec-8448412af360@petrovitsch.priv.at>
Date:   Wed, 25 Mar 2020 12:33:11 +0100
From:   Bernd Petrovitsch <bernd@...rovitsch.priv.at>
To:     Clement Courbet <courbet@...gle.com>
Cc:     Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@...il.com>,
        Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
        Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>,
        Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, x86@...nel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, clang-built-linux@...glegroups.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] x86: Alias memset to __builtin_memset.

Hi all!

Sry for being late at the party:

On 24/03/2020 16:59, Clement Courbet wrote:
[...]
> ---
>   arch/x86/include/asm/string_64.h | 10 ++++++++++
>   1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/string_64.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/string_64.h
> index 75314c3dbe47..9cfce0a840a4 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/string_64.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/string_64.h
> @@ -18,6 +18,15 @@ extern void *__memcpy(void *to, const void *from, size_t len);
>   void *memset(void *s, int c, size_t n);
>   void *__memset(void *s, int c, size_t n);
>   
> +/* Recent compilers can generate much better code for known size and/or
> + * fill values, and will fallback on `memset` if they fail.
> + * We alias `memset` to `__builtin_memset` explicitly to inform the compiler to
> + * perform this optimization even when -ffreestanding is used.
> + */
> +#if !defined(CONFIG_FORTIFY_SOURCE)
> +#define memset(s, c, count) __builtin_memset(s, c, count)
To be on the safe side, the usual way to write macros is like

#define memset(s, c, count) __builtin_memset((s), (c), (count))

as no one know what is passed as parameter to memset() and the extra 
pair of parentheses don't hurt.

And similar below (and I fear there are more places).

Or did I miss something in the Kernel?

> +#endif
> +
>   #define __HAVE_ARCH_MEMSET16
>   static inline void *memset16(uint16_t *s, uint16_t v, size_t n)
>   {
> @@ -74,6 +83,7 @@ int strcmp(const char *cs, const char *ct);
>   #undef memcpy
>   #define memcpy(dst, src, len) __memcpy(dst, src, len)
#define memcpy(dst, src, len) __memcpy((dst), (src), (len))
>   #define memmove(dst, src, len) __memmove(dst, src, len)
#define memmove(dst, src, len) __memmove((dst), (src), (len))
> +#undef memset
>   #define memset(s, c, n) __memset(s, c, n)
#define memset(s, c, n) __memset((s), (c), (n))
>   
>   #ifndef __NO_FORTIFY
> 

MfG,
	Bernd
-- 
Bernd Petrovitsch                  Email : bernd@...rovitsch.priv.at
                      LUGA : http://www.luga.at