[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200325131534.GA32284@localhost>
Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2020 06:15:35 -0700
From: Richard Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com>
To: Yangbo Lu <yangbo.lu@....com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
"David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@....com>,
Claudiu Manoil <claudiu.manoil@....com>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...il.com>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>,
Microchip Linux Driver Support <UNGLinuxDriver@...rochip.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/6] ptp_ocelot: support 4 programmable pins
On Fri, Mar 20, 2020 at 06:37:26PM +0800, Yangbo Lu wrote:
> Support 4 programmable pins for only one function periodic
> signal for now.
For now?
> +static int ocelot_ptp_verify(struct ptp_clock_info *ptp, unsigned int pin,
> + enum ptp_pin_function func, unsigned int chan)
> +{
> + switch (func) {
> + case PTP_PF_NONE:
> + case PTP_PF_PEROUT:
> + break;
If the functions cannot be changed, then supporting the
PTP_PIN_SETFUNC ioctl does not make sense!
> + case PTP_PF_EXTTS:
> + case PTP_PF_PHYSYNC:
> + return -1;
> + }
> + return 0;
> +}
Thanks,
Richard
Powered by blists - more mailing lists