linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v8 06/11] irqchip: mips-cpu: Convert to simple domain

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <c4520c4b0b0eaaba5fdbaebfce7b4460@kernel.org>
Date:   Wed, 25 Mar 2020 14:15:16 +0000
From:   Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>
To:     Jiaxun Yang <jiaxun.yang@...goat.com>
Cc:     Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@...ha.franken.de>,
        linux-mips@...r.kernel.org, Huacai Chen <chenhc@...ote.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+samsung@...nel.org>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com>,
        Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
        Allison Randal <allison@...utok.net>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 06/11] irqchip: mips-cpu: Convert to simple domain

On 2020-03-25 13:59, Jiaxun Yang wrote:

[...]

>>> So probably we can use legacy domain when  MIPS IRQ BASE is in the
>>> range of legacy IRQ
>>> and switch to simple domain when it's not in that range?
>> 
>> No, see below.
>> 
>>> Here in Loongson systems IRQ 0-15 is occupied by I8259 so I did this
>>> hack.
>> 
>> Well, if you have to consider which Linux IRQ gets assigned,
>> then your platform is definitely not ready for non-legacy
>> irqdomains. Just stick to legacy for now until you have removed
>> all the code that knows the hwirq mapping.
> 
> Thanks.
> 
> So I have to allocate irq_desc here in driver manually?

No, you are probably better off just dropping this patch, as MIPS
doesn't seem to be ready for a wholesale switch to virtual interrupts.

         M.
-- 
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...