lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 25 Mar 2020 22:31:21 +0800
From:   Jiaxun Yang <jiaxun.yang@...goat.com>
To:     Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>
CC:     Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@...ha.franken.de>,
        linux-mips@...r.kernel.org, Huacai Chen <chenhc@...ote.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+samsung@...nel.org>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com>,
        Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
        Allison Randal <allison@...utok.net>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 06/11] irqchip: mips-cpu: Convert to simple domain



于 2020年3月25日 GMT+08:00 下午10:15:16, Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org> 写到:
>On 2020-03-25 13:59, Jiaxun Yang wrote:
>
>[...]
>
>>>> So probably we can use legacy domain when  MIPS IRQ BASE is in the
>>>> range of legacy IRQ
>>>> and switch to simple domain when it's not in that range?
>>> 
>>> No, see below.
>>> 
>>>> Here in Loongson systems IRQ 0-15 is occupied by I8259 so I did
>this
>>>> hack.
>>> 
>>> Well, if you have to consider which Linux IRQ gets assigned,
>>> then your platform is definitely not ready for non-legacy
>>> irqdomains. Just stick to legacy for now until you have removed
>>> all the code that knows the hwirq mapping.
>> 
>> Thanks.
>> 
>> So I have to allocate irq_desc here in driver manually?
>
>No, you are probably better off just dropping this patch, as MIPS
>doesn't seem to be ready for a wholesale switch to virtual interrupts.

It can't work without this patch.

Legacy domain require IRQ number within 0-15 
however it's already occupied by i8259 or "HTPIC" driver.

Previously Loongson even didn't enable IRQ domain so it's not a problem.


>
>         M.

-- 
Jiaxun Yang

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ