[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87r1xgxzy6.fsf@nanos.tec.linutronix.de>
Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2020 15:37:53 +0100
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: hpa@...or.com, Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@...rix.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
x86@...nel.org, Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@...mens.com>,
James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>,
David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
Matthew Garrett <mjg59@...gle.com>,
Josh Boyer <jwboyer@...hat.com>,
Zhenzhong Duan <zhenzhong.duan@...cle.com>,
Steve Wahl <steve.wahl@....com>,
Mike Travis <mike.travis@....com>,
Dimitri Sivanich <dimitri.sivanich@....com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
"Peter Zijlstra \(Intel\)" <peterz@...radead.org>,
Giovanni Gherdovich <ggherdovich@...e.cz>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Martin Molnar <martin.molnar.programming@...il.com>,
Pingfan Liu <kernelfans@...il.com>,
jailhouse-dev@...glegroups.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/smpboot: Remove 486-isms from the modern AP boot path
hpa@...or.com writes:
> On March 25, 2020 3:14:31 AM PDT, Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@...rix.com> wrote:
>>@@ -1118,7 +1121,7 @@ static int do_boot_cpu(int apicid, int cpu,
>>struct task_struct *idle,
>> }
>> }
>>
>>- if (x86_platform.legacy.warm_reset) {
>>+ if (!APIC_INTEGRATED(boot_cpu_apic_version)) {
>> /*
>> * Cleanup possible dangling ends...
>> */
>
> We don't support SMP on 486 and haven't for a very long time. Is there
> any reason to retain that code at all?
Not that I'm aware off.
Thanks,
tglx
Powered by blists - more mailing lists