linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 00/14] efi/gop: Refactoring + mode-setting feature

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20200326235637.GA2364023@rani.riverdale.lan>
Date:   Thu, 26 Mar 2020 19:56:38 -0400
From:   Arvind Sankar <nivedita@...m.mit.edu>
To:     Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>
Cc:     Arvind Sankar <nivedita@...m.mit.edu>,
        Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>,
        linux-efi <linux-efi@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/14] efi/gop: Refactoring + mode-setting feature

On Thu, Mar 26, 2020 at 12:36:25AM +0100, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> 
> Yes, -ffreestanding implies -fno-builtin, which means that the
> compiler cannot assume it knows (and can optimize away) the behavior
> of strlen(), memset(), etc.

Yes exactly. Do you foresee any problems with removing it?

Thanks.