linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 00/14] efi/gop: Refactoring + mode-setting feature

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAMj1kXF3gVeDKBQxGcpb69DDSBU2DC1t1DDKYMRdx3nGWiLxEg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Sat, 28 Mar 2020 16:43:53 +0100
From:   Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>
To:     Arvind Sankar <nivedita@...m.mit.edu>
Cc:     Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>,
        linux-efi <linux-efi@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/14] efi/gop: Refactoring + mode-setting feature

On Fri, 27 Mar 2020 at 00:56, Arvind Sankar <nivedita@...m.mit.edu> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Mar 26, 2020 at 12:36:25AM +0100, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> >
> > Yes, -ffreestanding implies -fno-builtin, which means that the
> > compiler cannot assume it knows (and can optimize away) the behavior
> > of strlen(), memset(), etc.
>
> Yes exactly. Do you foresee any problems with removing it?
>

I'm not sure why it is there in the first place, but I wouldn't extend
huge issues when we remove it.