[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CADnq5_N65tF-b772uJ2E72=Er8JeeX9UZ34PVGqssprHCMGF1g@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2020 10:16:01 -0400
From: Alex Deucher <alexdeucher@...il.com>
To: Shane Francis <bigbeeshane@...il.com>
Cc: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>,
linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org,
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@...sung.com>,
David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"for 3.8" <stable@...r.kernel.org>,
"Michael J . Ruhl" <michael.j.ruhl@...el.com>,
Maling list - DRI developers
<dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@...e.de>,
Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/prime: fix extracting of the DMA addresses from a scatterlist
On Fri, Mar 27, 2020 at 6:25 AM Shane Francis <bigbeeshane@...il.com> wrote:
>
> Hello Marek,
>
> On Fri, Mar 27, 2020 at 9:00 AM Marek Szyprowski
> <m.szyprowski@...sung.com> wrote:
> > > I have tested the above patch against my original issues with amdgpu
> > > and radeon drivers and everything is still working as expected.
> > >
> > > Sorry I missed this in my original patches.
> >
> > No problem. Thanks for testing!
> >
> > Best regards
> > --
> > Marek Szyprowski, PhD
> > Samsung R&D Institute Poland
> >
> Just a thought.
>
> Would it be worth adding some comments to the code to explain why this
> is needed, reading
> the thread around my original patches and the DMA-API documentation it
> is not instantly
> clear why you would be mapping the pages in this way.
>
> Would probably prevent someone in the future making the same mistake I
> did while updating
> this code.
With a comment similar to the commit messaged added to this function,
this patch is:
Reviewed-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@....com>
Thanks!
Alex
Powered by blists - more mailing lists