[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200327154509.GB3971@ninjato>
Date:   Fri, 27 Mar 2020 16:45:09 +0100
From:   Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>
To:     Alex Deucher <alexdeucher@...il.com>
Cc:     Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>,
        Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@...g-engineering.com>,
        amd-gfx list <amd-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
        David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Maling list - DRI developers 
        <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
        Linux I2C <linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org>,
        Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@....com>,
        Christian König <christian.koenig@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/6] drm/radeon: convert to use i2c_new_client_device()
> > > > Move away from the deprecated API.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@...g-engineering.com>
> > >
> > > patches 1,6, are:
> > > Acked-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@....com>
> > Should we commit all to drm-misc-next?
> 
> I'm fine to see it go through whatever tree makes sense.
I'd suggest drm-misc-next to minimize merge conflicts. But I can take it
via I2C tree, too, if desired.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (834 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
 
