[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200327170342.GA5572@ravnborg.org>
Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2020 18:03:42 +0100
From: Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>
To: Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>
Cc: Alex Deucher <alexdeucher@...il.com>,
Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@...g-engineering.com>,
amd-gfx list <amd-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Maling list - DRI developers
<dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
Linux I2C <linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org>,
Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@....com>,
Christian König <christian.koenig@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/6] drm/radeon: convert to use i2c_new_client_device()
On Fri, Mar 27, 2020 at 04:45:09PM +0100, Wolfram Sang wrote:
>
> > > > > Move away from the deprecated API.
> > > > >
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@...g-engineering.com>
> > > >
> > > > patches 1,6, are:
> > > > Acked-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@....com>
> > > Should we commit all to drm-misc-next?
> >
> > I'm fine to see it go through whatever tree makes sense.
>
> I'd suggest drm-misc-next to minimize merge conflicts. But I can take it
> via I2C tree, too, if desired.
If no-one else speaks up until tomorrow I will land them in
drm-misc-next.
Just wanted to make sure it was OK.
Sam
Powered by blists - more mailing lists