linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH v1 01/50] IB/qib: Delete struct qib_ivdev.qp

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20200329160825.GA4675@SDF.ORG>
Date:   Sun, 29 Mar 2020 16:08:25 +0000
From:   George Spelvin <lkml@....ORG>
To:     Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Dennis Dalessandro <dennis.dalessandro@...el.com>,
        Mike Marciniszyn <mike.marciniszyn@...el.com>,
        linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org, lkml@....org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v1 01/50] IB/qib: Delete struct qib_ivdev.qp_rnd

On Sun, Mar 29, 2020 at 11:17:10AM -0300, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> You need to do a better job sending your patches, this is not
> threaded, and not cc'd to linux-rdma, so it doesn't show in the
> patchworks.

Indeed; mea culpa.  I forgot the magic option to git-format-patch.

Unfortunately, such things tend to get noticed only after the e-mail
has been sent and one has embarrassed oneself publicly.  :-(

> In general, do not send such large series for things that are not
> connected. Send small cleanups like this properly and directly so they
> can be applied.

They're all concpetually connected, but yes.

> I took care of it this time, so applied to the rdma tree as it is
> obviously correct.

I will drop it from my series, thank you!