[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <80236965-f0b5-c888-95ff-855bdec75bb3@huawei.com>
Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2020 10:44:43 +0800
From: Zhiqiang Liu <liuzhiqiang26@...wei.com>
To: <ebiederm@...ssion.com>, <oleg@...hat.com>,
<christian.brauner@...ntu.com>, <tj@...nel.org>,
<akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, <guro@...com>,
<joel@...lfernandes.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
CC: Mingfangsen <mingfangsen@...wei.com>,
linfeilong <linfeilong@...wei.com>, <liuzhiqiang26@...wei.com>
Subject: [PATCH] signal: use kill_proc_info instead of kill_pid_info in
kill_something_info
signal.c provides kill_proc_info, we can use it instead of kill_pid_info
in kill_something_info func gracefully.
Signed-off-by: Zhiqiang Liu <liuzhiqiang26@...wei.com>
---
kernel/signal.c | 8 ++------
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/signal.c b/kernel/signal.c
index 9ad8dea93dbb..33c70f9f1728 100644
--- a/kernel/signal.c
+++ b/kernel/signal.c
@@ -1552,12 +1552,8 @@ static int kill_something_info(int sig, struct kernel_siginfo *info, pid_t pid)
{
int ret;
- if (pid > 0) {
- rcu_read_lock();
- ret = kill_pid_info(sig, info, find_vpid(pid));
- rcu_read_unlock();
- return ret;
- }
+ if (pid > 0)
+ return kill_proc_info(sig, info, pid);
/* -INT_MIN is undefined. Exclude this case to avoid a UBSAN warning */
if (pid == INT_MIN)
--
2.19.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists