[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <a66e394f-3cf8-c102-a810-0c6dc3388527@xilinx.com>
Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2020 12:12:02 +0200
From: Michal Simek <michal.simek@...inx.com>
To: Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>,
Michal Simek <michal.simek@...inx.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Stefan Asserhall <stefan.asserhall@...inx.com>,
x86 <x86@...nel.org>, Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Subject: Re: [tip: irq/core] irqchip/xilinx: Enable generic irq multi handler
On 30. 03. 20 12:04, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> On 2020-03-30 10:27, Michal Simek wrote:
>> On 30. 03. 20 11:19, Marc Zyngier wrote:
>>> On 2020-03-30 10:12, Michal Simek wrote:
>>>> On 30. 03. 20 11:03, Michal Simek wrote:
>
> [...]
>
>>>> One more thing. We could also get this function back and it will be
>>>> fine
>>>> too. But up2you.
>>>
>>> If you leave it up to me, I'll revert the whole series right now.
>>>
>>> What I'd expect from you is to tell me exactly what is the minimal
>>> change that keeps it working on both ARM, microblaze and PPC.
>>> If it is a revert, tell me which patches to revert. if it is a patch
>>> on top, send me the fix so that I can queue it now.
>>
>> It won't be that simple. Please revert patches
>>
>> 9c2d4f525c00 ("irqchip/xilinx: Do not call irq_set_default_host()")
>> a0789993bf82 ("irqchip/xilinx: Enable generic irq multi handler")
>>
>> And we should be fine.
>
> Now reverted and pushed out. I'll send a pull request to Thomas tomorrow.
Thanks,
Michal
Powered by blists - more mailing lists