[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200401074722.4783de95@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2020 07:47:22 +1100
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To: Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>
Cc: Michal Simek <michal.simek@...inx.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Stefan Asserhall <stefan.asserhall@...inx.com>,
x86 <x86@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [tip: irq/core] irqchip/xilinx: Enable generic irq multi
handler
Hi Marc,
On Mon, 30 Mar 2020 11:04:14 +0100 Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> On 2020-03-30 10:27, Michal Simek wrote:
> > On 30. 03. 20 11:19, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> >> On 2020-03-30 10:12, Michal Simek wrote:
> >>> On 30. 03. 20 11:03, Michal Simek wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> >>> One more thing. We could also get this function back and it will be
> >>> fine
> >>> too. But up2you.
> >>
> >> If you leave it up to me, I'll revert the whole series right now.
> >>
> >> What I'd expect from you is to tell me exactly what is the minimal
> >> change that keeps it working on both ARM, microblaze and PPC.
> >> If it is a revert, tell me which patches to revert. if it is a patch
> >> on top, send me the fix so that I can queue it now.
> >
> > It won't be that simple. Please revert patches
> >
> > 9c2d4f525c00 ("irqchip/xilinx: Do not call irq_set_default_host()")
> > a0789993bf82 ("irqchip/xilinx: Enable generic irq multi handler")
> >
> > And we should be fine.
>
> Now reverted and pushed out. I'll send a pull request to Thomas
> tomorrow.
Unfortunately, those commits made it to Linus' tree without the reverts :-(
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists