[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+G9fYuZbptMh+_2V+iV9=8exHXeqG4+Vs=bX6AA20rOKf_iQQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2020 03:28:43 +0530
From: Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@...aro.org>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>, patches@...nelci.org,
Ben Hutchings <ben.hutchings@...ethink.co.uk>,
lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org,
linux- stable <stable@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.4 000/156] 5.4.29-rc2 review
On Tue, 31 Mar 2020 at 21:02, Greg Kroah-Hartman
<gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.4.29 release.
> There are 156 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Thu, 02 Apr 2020 14:12:16 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.4.29-rc2.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.4.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
Results from Linaro’s test farm.
No regressions on arm64, arm, x86_64, and i386.
NOTE:
selftests bpf test_verifier reports as failed due to below reasons,
#554/p jgt32 range bound deduction, reg op imm FAIL
#555/p jgt32 range bound deduction, reg1 op reg2, reg1 unknown FAIL
#556/p jle32 range bound deduction, reg1 op reg2, reg2 unknown FAIL
Since we are running v5.5 selftests on v5.4 branch kernel so not considering
as regressions. Where as same kernel version of tests PASS.
Summary
------------------------------------------------------------------------
kernel: 5.4.29-rc2
git repo: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git
git branch: linux-5.4.y
git commit: fae891585ecda7f340d1b290d12a36152d913632
git describe: v5.4.28-157-gfae891585ecd
Test details: https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-5.4-oe/build/v5.4.28-157-gfae891585ecd
No regressions (compared to build v5.4.28)
No fixes (compared to build v5.4.28)
Ran 32497 total tests in the following environments and test suites.
Environments
--------------
- dragonboard-410c
- hi6220-hikey
- i386
- juno-r2
- juno-r2-compat
- juno-r2-kasan
- nxp-ls2088
- qemu_arm
- qemu_arm64
- qemu_i386
- qemu_x86_64
- x15
- x86
- x86-kasan
Test Suites
-----------
* build
* install-android-platform-tools-r2600
* install-android-platform-tools-r2800
* kselftest
* libgpiod
* libhugetlbfs
* linux-log-parser
* ltp-cap_bounds-tests
* ltp-commands-tests
* ltp-containers-tests
* ltp-cpuhotplug-tests
* ltp-crypto-tests
* ltp-fcntl-locktests-tests
* ltp-filecaps-tests
* ltp-fs_bind-tests
* ltp-fs_perms_simple-tests
* ltp-fsx-tests
* ltp-hugetlb-tests
* ltp-ipc-tests
* ltp-math-tests
* ltp-mm-tests
* ltp-nptl-tests
* ltp-pty-tests
* ltp-securebits-tests
* ltp-syscalls-tests
* perf
* v4l2-compliance
* ltp-dio-tests
* ltp-io-tests
* ltp-sched-tests
* network-basic-tests
* kvm-unit-tests
* ltp-cve-tests
* ltp-open-posix-tests
* ltp-fs-tests
* spectre-meltdown-checker-test
* kselftest-vsyscall-mode-native
* kselftest-vsyscall-mode-none
--
Linaro LKFT
https://lkft.linaro.org
Powered by blists - more mailing lists