[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200401071851.GA31076@infradead.org>
Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2020 00:18:51 -0700
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To: Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@...el.com>
Cc: vkoul@...nel.org, tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com,
bp@...en8.de, hpa@...or.com, bhelgaas@...gle.com,
gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, arnd@...db.de,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org,
dmaengine@...r.kernel.org, dan.j.williams@...el.com,
ashok.raj@...el.com, fenghua.yu@...el.com,
linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, tony.luck@...el.com, jing.lin@...el.com,
sanjay.k.kumar@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/6] pci: add PCI quirk cmdmem fixup for Intel DSA device
On Mon, Mar 30, 2020 at 02:27:06PM -0700, Dave Jiang wrote:
> Since there is no standard way that defines a PCI device that receives
> descriptors or commands with synchronous write operations, add quirk to set
> cmdmem for the Intel accelerator device that supports it.
Why do we need a quirk for this? Even assuming a flag is needed in
struct pci_dev (and I don't really understand why that is needed to
start with), it could be set in ->probe.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists