[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200401074821.2tii2x2pzungea44@kamzik.brq.redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2020 09:48:21 +0200
From: Andrew Jones <drjones@...hat.com>
To: Peter Xu <peterx@...hat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@...el.com>,
"Michael S . Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>,
Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>,
Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@...el.com>,
Christophe de Dinechin <dinechin@...hat.com>,
Yan Zhao <yan.y.zhao@...el.com>,
Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@...hat.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
"Dr . David Alan Gilbert" <dgilbert@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 13/14] KVM: selftests: Let dirty_log_test async for
dirty ring test
On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 02:59:59PM -0400, Peter Xu wrote:
> Previously the dirty ring test was working in synchronous way, because
> only with a vmexit (with that it was the ring full event) we'll know
> the hardware dirty bits will be flushed to the dirty ring.
>
> With this patch we first introduced the vcpu kick mechanism by using
> SIGUSR1, meanwhile we can have a guarantee of vmexit and also the
> flushing of hardware dirty bits. With all these, we can keep the vcpu
> dirty work asynchronous of the whole collection procedure now. Still,
> we need to be very careful that we can only do it async if the vcpu is
> not reaching soft limit (no KVM_EXIT_DIRTY_RING_FULL). Otherwise we
> must collect the dirty bits before continuing the vcpu.
>
> Further increase the dirty ring size to current maximum to make sure
> we torture more on the no-ring-full case, which should be the major
> scenario when the hypervisors like QEMU would like to use this feature.
>
> Signed-off-by: Peter Xu <peterx@...hat.com>
> ---
> tools/testing/selftests/kvm/dirty_log_test.c | 126 +++++++++++++-----
> .../testing/selftests/kvm/include/kvm_util.h | 1 +
> tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/kvm_util.c | 9 ++
> 3 files changed, 106 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)
>
For the vcpu_kick and sem_wait stuff
Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <drjones@...hat.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists