[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200402123001.obgzqmlure4cfvh7@rric.localdomain>
Date: Thu, 2 Apr 2020 14:30:02 +0200
From: Robert Richter <rrichter@...vell.com>
To: Tang Bin <tangbin@...s.chinamobile.com>
CC: <thor.thayer@...ux.intel.com>, <bp@...en8.de>,
<mchehab@...nel.org>, <tony.luck@...el.com>, <james.morse@....com>,
<linux-edac@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] EDAC/altera:Use platform_get_irq_optional()
On 02.04.20 19:27:40, Tang Bin wrote:
> In order to simply code,because platform_get_irq() already has
> dev_err() message.
I don't see a difference other than hiding a -EPROBE_DEFER error
message. If that is your intention, please update subject and
description accordingly.
Thanks,
-Robert
>
> Signed-off-by: Tang Bin <tangbin@...s.chinamobile.com>
> ---
> drivers/edac/altera_edac.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/edac/altera_edac.c b/drivers/edac/altera_edac.c
> index e91cf1147..e12bad148 100644
> --- a/drivers/edac/altera_edac.c
> +++ b/drivers/edac/altera_edac.c
> @@ -2099,7 +2099,7 @@ static int altr_edac_a10_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> return -ENOMEM;
> }
>
> - edac->sb_irq = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0);
> + edac->sb_irq = platform_get_irq_optional(pdev, 0);
> if (edac->sb_irq < 0) {
> dev_err(&pdev->dev, "No SBERR IRQ resource\n");
> return edac->sb_irq;
> @@ -2134,7 +2134,7 @@ static int altr_edac_a10_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> }
> }
> #else
> - edac->db_irq = platform_get_irq(pdev, 1);
> + edac->db_irq = platform_get_irq_optional(pdev, 1);
> if (edac->db_irq < 0) {
> dev_err(&pdev->dev, "No DBERR IRQ resource\n");
> return edac->db_irq;
> --
> 2.20.1.windows.1
>
>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists