[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <54a09b5502ee45e9a926a025ae576498@bfs.de>
Date: Thu, 2 Apr 2020 13:40:49 +0000
From: Walter Harms <wharms@....de>
To: Colin King <colin.king@...onical.com>,
Alessandro Zummo <a.zummo@...ertech.it>,
Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>,
Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
Chris Packham <chris.packham@...iedtelesis.co.nz>,
"linux-rtc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-rtc@...r.kernel.org>
CC: "kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org" <kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: AW: [PATCH][next] rtc: ds1307: check for failed memory allocation on
wdt
________________________________________
Von: kernel-janitors-owner@...r.kernel.org <kernel-janitors-owner@...r.kernel.org> im Auftrag von Colin King <colin.king@...onical.com>
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 2. April 2020 15:14
An: Alessandro Zummo; Alexandre Belloni; Guenter Roeck; Chris Packham; linux-rtc@...r.kernel.org
Cc: kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Betreff: [PATCH][next] rtc: ds1307: check for failed memory allocation on wdt
From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>
Currently a failed memory allocation will lead to a null pointer
dereference on point wdt. Fix this by checking for a failed allocation
and adding error return handling to function ds1307_wdt_register.
Addresses-Coverity: ("Dereference null return")
Fixes: fd90d48db037 ("rtc: ds1307: add support for watchdog timer on ds1388")
Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>
---
drivers/rtc/rtc-ds1307.c | 15 ++++++++++-----
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/rtc/rtc-ds1307.c b/drivers/rtc/rtc-ds1307.c
index fad042118862..95c5b6facc59 100644
--- a/drivers/rtc/rtc-ds1307.c
+++ b/drivers/rtc/rtc-ds1307.c
@@ -1665,14 +1665,16 @@ static const struct watchdog_ops ds1388_wdt_ops = {
};
-static void ds1307_wdt_register(struct ds1307 *ds1307)
+static int ds1307_wdt_register(struct ds1307 *ds1307)
{
struct watchdog_device *wdt;
if (ds1307->type != ds_1388)
- return;
+ return 0;
wdt = devm_kzalloc(ds1307->dev, sizeof(*wdt), GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!wdt)
+ return -ENOMEM;
wdt->info = &ds1388_wdt_info;
wdt->ops = &ds1388_wdt_ops;
@@ -1683,10 +1685,13 @@ static void ds1307_wdt_register(struct ds1307 *ds1307)
watchdog_init_timeout(wdt, 0, ds1307->dev);
watchdog_set_drvdata(wdt, ds1307);
devm_watchdog_register_device(ds1307->dev, wdt);
+
+ return 0;
}
#else
-static void ds1307_wdt_register(struct ds1307 *ds1307)
+static int ds1307_wdt_register(struct ds1307 *ds1307)
{
+ return 0;
}
#endif /* CONFIG_WATCHDOG_CORE */
@@ -1979,9 +1984,9 @@ static int ds1307_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
ds1307_hwmon_register(ds1307);
ds1307_clks_register(ds1307);
- ds1307_wdt_register(ds1307);
+ err = ds1307_wdt_register(ds1307);
- return 0;
+ return err;
exit:
return err;
--
2.25.1
IMHO, one "return err;" is sufficient.
re,
wh
Powered by blists - more mailing lists