[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200402134051.GC9352@zn.tnic>
Date: Thu, 2 Apr 2020 15:40:51 +0200
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Michael Matz <matz@...e.de>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] x86 cleanups for v5.7
On Wed, Apr 01, 2020 at 05:16:24PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> Nobody else has a working compiler to even test that patch, because
> even upstream tip-of-the-day llvm mis-generates code (I have a patch
> that makes it generate ok code, but that one isn't good enough to
> actually go upstream in llvm).
Btw, looking at this:
https://reviews.llvm.org/rG50cac248773
and talking to a gcc guy (CCed), it should be also relatively easy to do
the fallthrough variant in gcc too so you could open a feature request
for that in the gcc bugzilla.
HTH.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette
Powered by blists - more mailing lists