[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200402183004.GJ20730@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Thu, 2 Apr 2020 20:30:04 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>
Cc: Julien Thierry <jthierry@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
raphael.gault@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/10] Objtool updates for easier portability
On Thu, Apr 02, 2020 at 12:58:27PM -0500, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 27, 2020 at 03:28:37PM +0000, Julien Thierry wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > This patchset includes some of the least controversial changes that
> > were needed as part of the arm64 port [1].
> >
> > I'm resending these rebase on top of linux-tip/core/objtool, following
> > the addition of Peter's patches [2]
> >
> > It consist mostly of small fixes or lifting some limitations to make it
> > easier to support a new architecture in objtool. Of course, these will
> > not be the only required changes, but these are the ones I hope make
> > enough sense to be merged separately from the rest of arm64 port series.
> >
> > Changes since v1[3]:
> > - Really just rebased things
> >
> > [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/1/9/643
> > [2] https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/3/25/807
> > [3] https://www.spinics.net/lists/kernel/msg3453718.html
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Julien
>
> I'm taking everything except 5, 7, and 10. I'll run them through
> testing and then send them along to the tip maintainers. Thanks!
For that set:
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@...radead.org>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists