linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 00/10] Objtool updates for easier portability

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <alpine.LSU.2.21.2004030916220.25955@pobox.suse.cz>
Date:   Fri, 3 Apr 2020 09:17:14 +0200 (CEST)
From:   Miroslav Benes <mbenes@...e.cz>
To:     Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
cc:     Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>,
        Julien Thierry <jthierry@...hat.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, raphael.gault@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/10] Objtool updates for easier portability

On Thu, 2 Apr 2020, Peter Zijlstra wrote:

> On Thu, Apr 02, 2020 at 12:58:27PM -0500, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 27, 2020 at 03:28:37PM +0000, Julien Thierry wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > > 
> > > This patchset includes some of the least controversial changes that
> > > were needed as part of the arm64 port [1].
> > > 
> > > I'm resending these rebase on top of linux-tip/core/objtool, following
> > > the addition of Peter's patches [2]
> > > 
> > > It consist mostly of small fixes or lifting some limitations to make it
> > > easier to support a new architecture in objtool. Of course, these will
> > > not be the only required changes, but these are the ones I hope make
> > > enough sense to be merged separately from the rest of arm64 port series.
> > > 
> > > Changes since v1[3]:
> > > - Really just rebased things
> > > 
> > > [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/1/9/643
> > > [2] https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/3/25/807
> > > [3] https://www.spinics.net/lists/kernel/msg3453718.html
> > > 
> > > Thanks,
> > > 
> > > Julien
> > 
> > I'm taking everything except 5, 7, and 10.  I'll run them through
> > testing and then send them along to the tip maintainers.  Thanks!
> 
> For that set:
> 
> Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@...radead.org>

And

Reviewed-by: Miroslav Benes <mbenes@...e.cz>

for the same.