[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20200403083543.11552-3-mhocko@kernel.org>
Date: Fri, 3 Apr 2020 10:35:43 +0200
From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Joel Fernandes <joel@...lfernandes.org>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Neil Brown <neilb@...e.de>, <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>,
"Paul E . McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] mm: make it clear that gfp reclaim modifiers are valid only for sleepable allocations
From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>
While it might be really clear to MM developers that gfp reclaim
modifiers are applicable only to sleepable allocations (those with
__GFP_DIRECT_RECLAIM) it seems that actual users of the API are not
always sure. Make it explicit that they are not applicable for
GFP_NOWAIT or GFP_ATOMIC allocations which are the most commonly used
non-sleepable allocation masks.
Acked-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...nel.org>
Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>
---
include/linux/gfp.h | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/include/linux/gfp.h b/include/linux/gfp.h
index e3ab1c0d9140..8040fa944cd8 100644
--- a/include/linux/gfp.h
+++ b/include/linux/gfp.h
@@ -127,6 +127,8 @@ struct vm_area_struct;
*
* Reclaim modifiers
* ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
+ * Please note that all the following flags are only applicable to sleepable
+ * allocations (e.g. %GFP_NOWAIT and %GFP_ATOMIC will ignore them).
*
* %__GFP_IO can start physical IO.
*
--
2.25.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists