[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <a8fd15498fc71fb1d6a02e463aeaade44574c06a.camel@analog.com>
Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2020 09:28:50 +0000
From: "Ardelean, Alexandru" <alexandru.Ardelean@...log.com>
To: "Markus.Elfring@....de" <Markus.Elfring@....de>,
"devel@...verdev.osuosl.org" <devel@...verdev.osuosl.org>,
"linux-iio@...r.kernel.org" <linux-iio@...r.kernel.org>
CC: "jic23@...nel.org" <jic23@...nel.org>,
"lorenzo.bianconi83@...il.com" <lorenzo.bianconi83@...il.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"knaack.h@....de" <knaack.h@....de>,
"pmeerw@...erw.net" <pmeerw@...erw.net>,
"lars@...afoo.de" <lars@...afoo.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] iio: make use of iio_device_attach_kfifo_buffer()
where straightforward
On Tue, 2020-04-07 at 11:26 +0200, Markus Elfring wrote:
> [External]
>
> How do you think about a patch subject like “iio: Increase use of
> iio_device_attach_kfifo_buffer()”?
>
>
> > This change does that.
>
> I suggest to improve also this commit message.
>
> * Would you like to consider a wording like “Convert a specific function call
> combination to a better programming interface.”?
>
> * Do you imagine any more software fine-tuning because of related
> collateral evolution?
>
I'll see.
This patchset is kind of stopped.
Will need a rework for it.
> Regards,
> Markus
Powered by blists - more mailing lists