[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1586266885.31587.1.camel@mtksdaap41>
Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2020 21:41:25 +0800
From: Yingjoe Chen <yingjoe.chen@...iatek.com>
To: <light.hsieh@...iatek.com>
CC: <linus.walleij@...aro.org>, <sean.wang@...nel.org>,
<kuohong.wang@...iatek.com>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] pinctrl: mediatek: remove shadow variable
declaration
On Tue, 2020-04-07 at 18:33 +0800, light.hsieh@...iatek.com wrote:
> From: Light Hsieh <light.hsieh@...iatek.com>
>
> Remove shadow declaration of variable 'pullup' in mtk_pinconf_get()
>
> Signed-off-by: Light Hsieh <light.hsieh@...iatek.com>
> ---
> drivers/pinctrl/mediatek/pinctrl-paris.c | 2 --
> 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/mediatek/pinctrl-paris.c b/drivers/pinctrl/mediatek/pinctrl-paris.c
> index 83bf29c..8f75115 100644
> --- a/drivers/pinctrl/mediatek/pinctrl-paris.c
> +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/mediatek/pinctrl-paris.c
> @@ -164,8 +164,6 @@ static int mtk_pinconf_get(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev,
> case MTK_PIN_CONFIG_PU_ADV:
> case MTK_PIN_CONFIG_PD_ADV:
> if (hw->soc->adv_pull_get) {
> - bool pullup;
> -
> pullup = param == MTK_PIN_CONFIG_PU_ADV;
> err = hw->soc->adv_pull_get(hw, desc, pullup, &ret);
> } else
Hi, Light,
What is this based on?
The code in v5.6 doesn't looks like this.
Joe.C
Powered by blists - more mailing lists